Denise Brailey on Low Doc Loans Scandal

Karl FitzgeraldMultimedia3 Comments

Renegade Economists Podcast 250

As broadcast on 3CR Wed August 22nd

Listen to the Renegade Economist interview

Denise Brailey is the President of the Banking and Finance Consumer Support Association. For the last eight years she has helped distressed home buyers investigate why banks lent them more than they could afford. Last week she presented to the Senate on the trail of fraud and deception that borrowers have faced. The story made the 730 Report but little else.

As background, read Phil Soos’ excellent piece from the Conversation on Australia’s sub-prime crisis.

Hear past shows
Read about the Renegade Economists, subscribe to the itunes feed.

photo by: Vectorportal

Magic Money Quotes

Karl FitzgeraldCommentary, Hot Issues5 Comments

Earthsharing and Australia’s 2nd richest man Harry Triguboff are quoted in Forget Undersupply, We’ve Got Too Many Houses, AFR July 7-8:

Apartment billionaire Harry Triguboff was surprisingly candid at a lunch held by the American Chamber of Commerce last October.

He told the audience he was able to pay “very little tax”.

“I keep a lot of my properties. And if you keep them and there’s capital gain it’s beautiful,” he says “You don’t pay tax. I don’t lease them so I don’t pay tax on the rent, but I get depreciation.”

He paid tax on apartment sales but that’s where the land banking came in.

“You have to buy lots of empty land,” he said. “You keep the land and it brings you no income, so you claim it against your tax.”

From the same article:

“I remember back in the global financial crisis we were worried about the amount of stock on the market and then I think it got up to around 240,000,” Kusher says. “What would be good for the market is if some of those people realise that they’re not selling, there’s not much point in keeping it advertised, take that property off the market.”

Poor Richard Pratt gets nicked for rigging the price of cardboard boxes, but its fine for mainstream media commentators to make such Real Estate 4 Ransom statements.

In Doncaster railway line ‘could be built for $840m’

The report found that property values in Brisbane in the past 25 years had risen 23 per cent more in suburbs with high-quality public transport than those without.

Read Ben Hurley’s We Spend, You Win, You Pay where we hear Lucy Turnbull, deputy chair of the Cities Expert Panel:

“You could argue that property owners are getting a windfall gain from the provision of infrastructure without making some kind of contribution from the property value rise that they enjoy,” Mrs Turnbull said. “In an ideal world, they would pay a fair and reasonable component of the infrastructure which they directly enjoy. You couldn’t argue that’s not a fair proposition.”

Moving to the UK, as if money printing hasn’t been a big enough subsidy (let alone the corporate control of the Olympics), please consider the danger falling land prices have on banks. For students of these pages this will come as no surprise, but the UK government is trying to further their support of insiders in the banking and property sectors, not by money printing, but railway investment – the biggest in 150 years:

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Greening agreed that too much of the taxpayer-funded Network Rail grant was paying for “waste and inefficiency” among profit-making private rail companies.

That’s to say nothing of the leakage inherent in how the train system will be financed. The above quote is akin to ‘we will crush the unions but reward our rent-seeking landed interests’. With economic rent analysis barely taught at University, the lucky few get a red carpet ride into the magic money trough.

It would be of immense interest to see if the £9bn UK public investment delivers a 300% return for insiders with capital gains of £27bn as per the Jubilee train line.

Free Riders on Public Transport from Real Estate 4 Ransom on Vimeo.

This modelling tool by London School of Economic’s Dr Gabriel Ahlfeldt, lecturer in urban economics and land development, may well be able to predict such capital gains.

One day the public will use this magic money to finance rail expansion in a closed loop system of financing.

Hear Professor Peter Newman discuss how this is possible.

photo by: Images_of_Money

Community & Economics

Karl FitzgeraldCommentary, Past EventsLeave a Comment


Tuesday July 24th
1/27 Hardware Lane, Melbourne
6.30 – 8pm
Presenter: Karl Williams

RSVP – gold coin event

Countless studies have shown that a sense of community is one of the most important factors leading to happiness, fulfillment and the sense of a life well lived, no matter what the culture.

But what do we mean by community? It seems that we’ve completely lost its meaning, for nowadays we’re constantly hearing of absurdities such as the banking community, the sporting community and the international community?!!

Karl Williams, our presenter, thinks he knows quite a bit about fostering community – he’s downshifted years ago from chartered accounting to humble but satisfying work in local community and neighbourhood houses. He’s also stayed and worked on around 30 “intentional communities” around the world.

Strange as it may appear, there’s a strong connection between the type of economic system in place and our personal sense of community. Karl is also a past president of Prosper Australia and a former editor of Progress.

All welcome, gold coin donation, light supper provided.

Housing Oversupply Evidence Builds

Karl FitzgeraldHot Issues2 Comments

The Financial Review’s Ben Hurley has revealed an absolute game changer in the age old housing supply debate:

Adjusted by Morgan Stanley researchers to allow for a potential census under count, the 228,000-home undersupply becomes a 341,000-home oversupply.

This adds to the imperative for better checks and balances in housing supply analysis. Our recent Speculative Vacancies report revealed Melbourne had 90,700 empty homes. This adds to the concern that housing prices are higher than they should be.

Most markets see additional supply putting downward pricing pressure. However, land and location is a different animal. There is only one GPS location on this planet. Land doesn’t age and can’t be replaced. We all want to live in amiable locations and communities. This gives the owner of land, the most precious of resources, a dominant advantage. This challenges our ability to determine our place on this planet.

The drip feeding of the market must be questioned as ethical behaviour. Our film Real Estate 4 Ransom critiques this behaviour and the tax system that encourages it.

Consider the staggering fact that Lend Lease (in the press for their higher than expected profits) have released just 29 properties to market over at least 18 months out of the council approved 4900 vacancies.

Akin to the unemployment rate, that is a lazy land use of 99.94%. This has helped maintain a land price of $157,000.

Marc Pallisco, from the Age’s Capital Gain section writes (June 23, 2012):

The developer negotiated with council to create a community with 4900 blocks, but instead will offer just nine to the market this weekend, priced from $157,000. This stage follows the late 2011 launch when 20 blocks were offered using a ballot method to prospective buyers who registered an interest online.

Critics of the current taxpayer-funded public housing building boom, and housing affordability advocates, argue a dent could be made if developers were prevented from self-regulating supply, otherwise known as land banking.

Developers, however, argue land values are preserved selling land this way.

What would happen if supply was opened up? The question then is – who is Lend Lease responsible to – their shareholders or the community? One look at their Our Values, Our Promise page and you are inundated with all the Corporate Social Responsibility needed to put one at ease:

Respect, Collaboration, Integrity, Excellence, Innovation, Trust

The ledger between shareholder and community responsibility was once re-balanced via Land Taxes. The longer these locations were held for ransom, the more they paid. As a percentage of holding cost vis capital gain, these have been ratcheted down to such an extent that they barely equate to a months rent these days.

As Speculative Vacancies author Philip Soos states:

Since 1996, Australia has experienced yet another boom in housing prices (specifically land prices), fueled by the loose lending standards of financial institutions and generous tax subsidies for property. These two factors have ensured that property speculation is an immensely profitable activity, becoming a national pastime for Australians. Melbourne has become a focal point of frenzied debt-financed speculation, resulting in the greatest escalation of housing prices in its history.

One can only hope that the hundred’s of thousands of people who have taken on an inflated mortgage for the next 25 years will take an interest in the way such information is portrayed and understood.

As the ramifications of the global property bubble continue to remind us, asset bubbles always end in tears. It is time the public took matters into their own hands to ensure this doesn’t happen again.

Speculative Vacancies in Melbourne 2012

Karl FitzgeraldCampaigns, CommentaryLeave a Comment

Philip Soos

21st June 2012

Executive Summary

It is generally accepted that a crisis is occurring in rental property markets of most metropolitan areas in Australia, including Melbourne. Since 2006, rental prices have increased significantly above the rate of inflation, causing many tenants to experience financial stress. Accordingly, the lack of affordable and available rental properties is an ongoing concern. This report fills a void in property analysis by estimating the number of long-term vacant properties that could potentially be placed on the rental market to increase supply. These properties are not reflected in reported vacancy rates.

Water consumption data supplied by two of Melbourne’s retailers, City West Water and Yarra Valley Water, is used as a proxy to determine vacancies. A conservative cut-off point of 50 litres per day (L/d) per property, averaged over a six month period from July to December 2011, was chosen. Evidence indicates that per capita consumption averaged 140L/d in 2010/11, with average household consumption estimated at approximately 350L/d.

Analysis of 1,015,599 residential properties shows that 60,103 properties (5.9%) were potentially vacant over the study period, having consumed less than 50L/d. This figure rises to 90,730 when extrapolated across the entire residential property market. A large number of commercial properties (24.2%) were also potentially vacant in the suburbs where data are provided.

One hypothesis to account for why these properties remain vacant is the escalation in capital appreciation of property values (specifically land values) as housing prices in Melbourne have risen by 180%, adjusted for inflation and quality, between 1996 and 2010. Landlords have an incentive to withhold properties from the rental market as they profit substantially from realizing capital gains upon sale rather than from long-term rental income.

It is argued that a substantial land value tax would serve as a withholding cost and helps to blunt capital appreciation, ensuring landlords cover costs through rental income, not capital gain. Policymakers could benefit by examining the reasons as to why many residential properties are kept off the market, especially during a period of prolonged rental price increases and financial stress.

Press Release
PDF version of report (html below)
Read More