Today’s big announcement promoted by the Rudd government:
The $512 million Housing Affordability Fund, promised before the last election, is expected to help 50,000 new home buyers in the next five years.

“What I am signalling loud and clear is that we …

but it's what under it that counts!

[/caption]

Quoted in today’s Melbourne Leader:

DESPERATE room seekers fret not: speed renting has arrived.

In ways similar to its dating counterpart, speed renting gives desperate room seekers …

photo credit: derekkeats

Mark Braund
Guardian UK

The South African government’s recent decision to abandon its Expropriation Bill, aimed at addressing the painfully slow pace of …

Last night’s Insight focused on the tragedy unfolding in the housing market and it’s effects on the rest of the economy. It was good to see that Housing Supply side issues got some time on air, but again the property lobby had large numbers in the crowd, no NGO’s got a guernsey, the omnipresent Ross Gittins took the softly softly line and outside of Steve Keen, there was not the sort of hard hitting critique needed.

The Real Estate lobby again pushed for more land supply. Result - cheap land for speculators to extort the market. Someone mentioned building high speed rail to Penrith and surrounding areas. Result - the added benefits are capitalised into higher land prices - benefiting whom? Those speculators with inside contacts. Debt was mentioned at 7 times the average wage - yes, but why? The high cost of land due to land speculation, inefficient government developer charges and the failure to capture the economic rent. Supply side was mentioned by 1 young academic and a few others, but no one dared to mention how.

Supply side? 119,623 vacant homes in Melbourne. Supply would be increased if the most efficient tax of all is implemented, the one students are taught in economics as the most effective way for government to raise revenue with the least distortions. It’s called Land Tax.

Let’s rename it as a Site Rental. No one likes a tax. We don’t like how it is presently administered, but we agree with the property lobby that it should be set at a flat rate. However, we differ in seeing that it should be set at a higher rate, funding the abolition of income and sales taxes.

Holding charges on land are barely 2%, whilst land values have increased at over 10% p.a for over a decade. The two are inter-related. Increase holding charges and speculation is diminished. Land banking becomes no longer profitable. Read more here and on our sister website

But what did other bloggers say?

Tohm Curtis continues his slightly sarcastic journey into the underpinnings of economics

Okay in Lesson 1, I concluded with the not so startling revelation that the economy was ultimately limited by the external environment or reality. Economics is a science because it’s constrained by reality, and hence people use observations to make predictions on how the natural environment will behave.

But so too is physics, mathematics etc. Lets go further now and look at economics as the study of decisions and what makes a good or bad decision. What is the result of a good decision?

Profits - Doing More with Less:

I’m from a business school and thus naturally in my mind, the result of a good decision is profit. Don’t let that turn you off as an activist though. Hopefully you would agree that profit occurs as a result of a decision where our return exceeds the cost of making that decision. The cost - benefit analysis.

So the recipe for profit is efficiency, in every manifestation in the corporate world, the business world, in trade, in economics, profit is derived from doing more with less. Sometimes it is getting more of the customers’ money, for the same product, then you are using your customers efficiently. Or it is from selling the same product to new customers, instead of developing new products which are expensive. Or it is from reducing your product and selling it at the same price.